|
Let's keep the hogs at the public trough from raising our taxes by
pushing to impose tolls on existing freeways for their personal
profiteering! Fight back by emailing the MPO here.
Phone numbers to elected officials on the MPO and information on the
October 26 MPO meeting where they'll decide whether or not to keep 281,
1604 toll roads or fix them as freeways are at www.FixGridlock.com If you want to see who is paying the San Antonio Mobility Coalition (SAMCo) to lobby AGAINST the taxpayers go here. __________________________________________________________________________
In yet another glaring example of taxpayer-funded lobbying, the San Antonio Mobility Coalition
(SAMCo), a coalition of over 70 private companies who profit from road
building, has sent out multiple email blasts encouraging its members to
lobby the MPO to keep 281 and 1604 toll roads. The emails also contain
blatantly erroneous and even libelous information as well as glaring
examples of "the sky is falling" hysteria. Let's not forget
that SAMCo is also supported by dues from the City of San Antonio and
Bexar County. The County has contributed in excess of $250,000 since
2005. SAMCo is chaired by none other than pro-toll Terrell McCombs,
with Jim Reed of the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority (ARMA, the
tolling authority) as an officer. Guess who else sits on the Executive
Committee? Mayor Julian Castro and Councilman John Clamp (who also
serves on the MPO). Good Guy Commissioner Adkisson is also on the
Executive Committee since the MPO Chair has an automatic seat (I
believe its the same for the Mayor and County Judge). But after you
read SAMCo's email, I don't think you'd fault Commissioner Adkisson for
not attending the meetings or supporting this organization.
SAMCo Members:
On October 19 and 26, the Bexar County/San Antonio MPO will host two
special meetings to consider revisions to the project descriptions and
funding sources for the US 281 North and Loop 1604 Projects.
Specifically, the MPO Policy Board will receive testimony on a proposal
by Bexar County Commissioner Tommy Adkisson and Comal County resident
Terri Hall to eliminate toll financing as an option for funding US 281,
Loop 1604, or other projects in Bexar County. Instead, the
Commissioner and Ms. Hall have proposed a plan for US 281 and Loop 1604
that provides far less congestion relief for motorists, eliminates
two-thirds of new lanes along Loop 1604, truncates US 281, makes faulty
funding assumptions, and risks losing San Antonio’s existing federal
stimulus funding. After considered review, we believe the MPO Policy Board should reject the Adkisson/Hall plan for the following reasons:
1) The plan completely removes 16.33 miles of Loop 1604
improvements between Bandera Road and Redland Road, leaving motorists
stuck in traffic near I-10, US 281, UTSA, and other key corridor
segments. 2) The plan will result in a substantial
reduction in scope for the US 281 North by reducing funding from $475
to $200 million. The plan does not address how the project would be
re-engineered to reflect a funding reduction of 58 percent.
3) The plan risks losing $216 million in Texas Mobility Fund (TMF)
dollars that have been reserved by TxDOT for Loop 1604 and US 281 as
leveraged (i.e. tolled) projects. Because the Commission (TxDOT) has
required projects in other urban regions to meet TMF leveraging
requirements, we believe it is extremely doubtful that the Commission
would make an exception for San Antonio that would expose TxDOT to
charges of favoritism and unfairness. 4) The plan risks
losing $140 million in federal stimulus (ARRA) and Prop 14 dollars
awarded specifically for the US 281/Loop 1604 Interchange. The plan
unilaterally diverts $60 million in Prop 14 dollars from the
Interchange to US 281 North and attempts to substitute a similar
amount of TMF dollars in its place – also likely to be rejected due to
leverage requirements and other technical issues. With the Interchange
no longer fully funded, Commissioners would have little option but to
transfer the $140 million to the next eligible “shovel ready” project
on the statewide federal stimulus list developed by TxDOT last
February. This might not be in San Antonio. 5) The plan
assumes the Transportation Commission will allocate $200 million in
Proposition 12 dollars to Loop 1604. As of today’s date, the
Commission has yet to determine how $1 billion available from Prop 12
dollars for the current biennium will be allocated. Based on last
month’s Commission workshop, it appears that much of this funding will
be allocated to safety/maintenance projects and to statewide
connectivity (for example I-35 north of Waco). Whatever remains for
“urban mobility” will likely be awarded through a competitive call for
projects. 6) The plan is not geographically balanced and
fails to provide a system-wide solution for congestion, focusing only
on small parts of US 281 and Loop 1604 and leaving little or no funding
for transportation improvements in other part of San Antonio and Bexar
County. Since our inception in 2001, SAMCo has supported
introduction of new and expanded funding tools and approaches –
including tolling as a funding option of last resort - to address
declining levels of traditional state and federal funding. In
an era of increasing uncertainty regarding future available funding and
with more than $19 billion in unmet transportation needs for our region
by 2030 (2006 MPO estimate), we would urge members of the Bexar
County/San Antonio MPO Transportation Policy Board to: 1) Retain all funding options in the MPO’s future plans for US 281, Loop 1604, and other added capacity projects;
2) Support the ongoing Alamo RMA Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) processes for US 281 and Loop 1604, which will include
development of both toll and non-toll options. With two or more years
of intense study still ahead, there is no need at this time to
pre-determine the outcome or eliminate any particular option;
3) Reject any plan that does not provide a system-wide solution or
that creates a significant geographic imbalance in how the MPO’s
transportation funds are allocated. 4) Continue to
support local option legislation, federal and state motor fuels
increases/indexing, and creation of other new revenue sources to
provide potential new funding for San Antonio projects;
5) Continue to support development of “Super Street” projects
along both US 281 North and Loop 1604 (west) to provide some measure of
temporary relief while the longer term studies are being completed. How SAMCo members/partners can help:
1) Attend the October 19 and 26 public meetings Click here for
details and register to say a few brief words In support of keeping all
funding options on the table. 2) Strongly encourage your
co-workers, employees, business associates, friends, neighbors, etc. to
do the same. It is important that the MPO Policy Board see that there
is broad-based support for moving forward with these mobility projects
and approaches. Consider car-pooling to the meetings, especially the
evening of October 26. 3) Send a brief one or two sentence email to the MPO Policy Board letting them know you support: a. Retaining all available options to fund US 281, Loop 1604, and future mobility projects b. A system wide solution, not just a solution that only addresses a few selected miles c. Moving forward with the Alamo RMA’s Environmental Processes for US 281 and Loop 1604 d. Anything else you might want to add to personalize your email
e. Just cut and paste the following email addresses for all voting
and ex-officio (nonvoting) MPO members:
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
;
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
4) We will continue to provide updates as this issue evolves.
A small minority has dominated this issue for too long, with
significant consequences for San Antonio’s quality of life and economic
future. It is time to change that. Thank you in advance for your assistance in this effort. Vic
Victor M. Boyer Executive Director San Antonio Mobility Coalition, Inc. (SAMCo) 13526 George Road #107 San Antonio, TX 78230 (210) 688-4407 - Phone (210) 688-4507 - Fax
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
_______________________________________________________________________
Our response to this vitriolic email from SAMCo:
There
are glaring inaccuracies in Vic Boyer's email (above). First of all,
the non-toll plan is not Commissioner Adkisson's or my plan, it's
TxDOT's plan promised to the public in hearings in 2001.
It doesn't risk stimulus money, and, in fact, the RMA seeking an
environmental exemption on the interchange and it's failure to
coordinate with the City of Hollywood Park risks losing stimulus money
far more than shifting pots of money ever could. They've been warned
from day one that how ever they design the interchange will
pre-determine what it connects to in the future (either a future toll
road or non-toll lanes), and will prejudice both the 281 and 1604
environmental studies (that require all alternatives to be studied).
The RMA's vacillation on the promise to build the entire interchange non-toll, only to abandon the northbound ramps, makes their intent to impose tolls in the future on 281 abundantly clear.
The non-toll amendment before the MPO only affects 281 north and the
west side of 1604 (by Braun Rd) and uses money already allocated to
those roadways and DOES NOT take money from other projects. San Antonio
can expect about 10% of the Prop 12 monies to come to our region. TxDOT
is trying to advance Wurzbach Pkwy for that money, which is far less
congested than both 281 and 1604 west. By TxDOT's own admission, if a
reasonable source of revenue can be identified (in this case Prop 12
and Texas Mobility Funds which have already been allocated to
281/1604), it's sufficient to place it into the short range and long
range plans at the MPO.
The eventual pot of money may change. In
addition, the Texas Mobility Funds DO NOT REQUIRE leveraging or
tolling. The Transportation Commission's own Minute Order shows in
black and white that Texas Mobility Funds can be used for FREEways and
that it's not necessary to toll a road to get access to them. It's also
possible to meet the bogus leveraging requirement for the Texas
Mobility Funds with a different source of revenue (instead of Prop 14
bonds), which Commissioner Adkisson is working on (with next to no
cooperation from any of the agencies). By comparison,
virtually every segment of the current toll plans are not funded
either, and make financial assumptions that cannot be substantiated. To
assume massive leveraged debt to fix the entire northside at one time
is reckless. This proposed toll system is unsustainable and requires
MULTI-BILLIONS to be sucked out of our local economy, money that now
goes to support local restaurants, stores, hotels, movie theaters will
now have to go to transportation costs that few in San Antonio can
afford. If they could, the toll road would pay for itself and not need
to be subsidized with public money!
San Antonio cannot
afford the interest on $900 million of debt for the 1604 toll road and
the $864 million in interest just for the 281 toll project (not
counting the interest on the other loans proposed to subsidize the 281
project). I'll be 90 years old when these tollways would be be paid
off, if they're EVER paid for before going into default (which just happened in South Carolina).
What on earth are we doing? In addition, the non-compete agreements
that prohibit or penalize the region for expanding or building any new
free lanes surrounding the tollways for up to 50 years at a time is
plain malfeasance. That means Stone Oak Pkwy, Bulverde Rd., Blanco Rd.,
Braun Rd., Shaenfield, Culebra, Bander, etc. The MPO is an
equal player in transportation decision-making along with the FHWA and
Transportation Commission. Though under Rick Perry Transportation
Commission decisions have become highly politicized and bullying and
threats have ruled the day, ultimately, these roads cannot be tolled if
the MPO votes to make them non-tolled. Let's not forget Perry is a
heated primary battle and has already retreated on the Trans Texas
Corridor because "there was no political support for it." Well, clearly
there has been no political support for tolling our existing freeways
in San Antonio either. So it's pure hogwash to say the
non-toll options will cause the sky to fall. This is pure politics. We
can have an endless impasse and get nothing done, or we can move this
community forward.
Contact your city, county, and state elected officials and MPO Board members NOW to tell them to VOTE NO TO TOLLS and fix our freeways without TOLLS!
|