Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Latest News arrow General arrow Idaho DOT head fired for reducing cost to taxpayers
Idaho DOT head fired for reducing cost to taxpayers PDF Print E-mail
Written by Terri Hall   
Wednesday, 11 November 2009
Link to article here. We can actually begin to see a trend here...Schwarzenegger tried to oust his own appointee for being critical of giving gravy train contracts to the private sector when it can be done cheaper by the public sector and save taxpayers' money. Bullies all! Our elected officials DO NOT work for us any longer, they work for the high-paid lobbyists who grease the wheels of government.

Former Idaho transportation head sues over firing
AP ONLINE
November 6, 2009

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — The former head of the Idaho Transportation Department filed a lawsuit Friday against the agency, saying she was fired in a political power play to help Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter and his big campaign donors.

The lawsuit in 4th District Court claims Pamela Lowe was fired by the Transportation Department board after refusing to bow to threats by governor's aides not to interfere with a contract originally worth $50 million. The contract benefitted URS Corp. and CH2M Hill.

Lowe says Jeff Malmen, the governor's former chief of staff, and Darrell Manning, chairman of the Idaho Transportation Board, grew upset after she told the state Legislature in 2007 she would renegotiate the contract so as much of the work as possible was done by the highway agency's own employees.

"Ms. Lowe was repeatedly warned and harassed by the governor's staff and Mr. Manning about taking work away" from the companies, according to her lawsuit. "Ms. Lowe was not deterred by these threats."

The two engineering companies have given the governor at least $22,000 combined since 2005.

After she refused to resign, Lowe was fired in July. The board cited concerns over "improving customer service, economy of operations, accountability and our relations with the Legislature."

Lowe succeeded in trimming the contract but claims she was fired this year before she could take virtually all the work back from the companies.

She is seeking back pay, reinstatement or compensation in lieu of that, and attorney's fees, according to her lawsuit. No amount is specified.

Jon Hanian, Otter's spokesman, said, "because this is in litigation, we are unable to comment."

Malmen, now a lobbyist at the Idaho Power Co., didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Manning, who previously has said there wasn't a connection between the contract and Lowe's firing, was out of town and couldn't be reached, the transportation department said.

By law, the Idaho Transportation Board can remove its director for "inefficiency, neglect of duty, malfeasance and nonfeasance in office."

But Lowe contends she had received satisfactory performance reviews.

Her lawsuit also contends that a bill introduced in the 2009 state Legislature by state Sen. John McGee, R-Caldwell, was meant "to punish her for cutting CIP's contract." It would have given Otter the power to fire the highway department director.

In a telephone interview, Lowe said agency board members told her they feared McGee's bill would undermine their authority so they relented to pressure to force her out. The board hires the director.

McGee said Friday that he had "a different experience" of what happened but said he can't comment because of the lawsuit.

When he introduced his bill in March, McGee contended he was dissatisfied with Lowe's performance. Some lawmakers also said they didn't trust her agency, citing that as one reason for voting against bills like Otter's proposed $61 million gas tax hike during the 2009 session.

Lowe initially lodged a tort claim against Idaho in August, a notification that she was considering a lawsuit. She hasn't heard from the state since then, she said, and filed this new lawsuit Friday to meet a statutory deadline for whistleblower complaints.

Additional claims, including for gender discrimination, will be added to the lawsuit next week, said Erika Birch, Lowe's attorney.

Lowe doesn't think Idaho has made a serious effort to investigate her claim but said she's gotten messages of support from her former employees at the Transportation Department to press ahead in court.

"That's really helped," she said.

 
< Prev   Next >

Newsflash

Poll: Texans don’t want tolls, gas tax hikes

Link to poll story here or read it below.

The headline declares Texans want their roads fixed but don't want to pay for them. But it's not a matter of not wanting to fund them, it's a matter of economics. Texans don't have any more money to give to transportation with gas at $4 a gallon! The cost of living is rising much faster than our ability to pay for it. Then, when you consider TxDOT spending $100,000 a month on lobbyists and $9 million on an ad campaign pushing toll roads and the Trans Texas Corridor, frivolous spending like $18 million rest stops with free Wi-Fi, and the endless raiding from our gas taxes that we ALREADY PAY for roads, it's no wonder Texans are in no mood for tax hikes.

Add to all that the fact that the State of Texas has had surplus after surplus (which is a result of overtaxation) with another $15 billion surplus projected by the start of next year's legislative session, Texans don't believe the State is out of money or that we're taxed too little, not for one minute!

I found it interesting that the poll didn't use numbers at all like amount of gas tax hike or any cost comparisons on toll project costs versus freeways. Like on US 281, to keep it a freeway would cost $170 million, but to make it a toll road, it will cost $1.3 billion. This would likely draw much stronger opposition to tolling existing roads given that information. They also shied away from informing people about the specific number of lane-miles slated to be tolled and how much they'd pay per mile in tolls versus gas tax, which would help people make a more informed comparison of the choices and show that it will be difficult to avoid taking the more expensive toll roads with so many in the queue.

Nonetheless the message is clear, Texans don't want tolls or higher transportation costs, period.

New poll shows Texans want better roads, don't want to pay for them
By CHRISTY HOPPE / The Dallas Morning News
Wednesday, June 25, 2008

AUSTIN – Texans think congestion is a serious problem and want road improvements, but a solid majority is adamantly against paying at the toll booth or gas pump for bigger and better highways, a poll released today shows.

Read more...