House Subcommittee on Highways hearing - Massie shreds panelist
Massie shreds panelist about the pie in the sky remote kill switch technology during the first House Subcommittee on Highways hearing of the new congress on February 12, 2025.
Help us fight to preserve our rights and freedoms!
or donate by mail. We cannot do it without you!
Massie shreds panelist about the pie in the sky remote kill switch technology during the first House Subcommittee on Highways hearing of the new congress on February 12, 2025.
From Homer’s “Odyssey” to Bunyan’s “Pilgrim’s Progress,” great authors have often communicated timeless truths through tales of long journeys. Two years ago, a Biden administration official set out to make a point through her own long road trip. Her trip did make a point, but not the one she intended.
In the summer of 2023, Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm and a cadre of aides took a four-day road trip in electric vehicles (EVs) that meandered from Charlotte, N.C. to Memphis, Tenn. The trip was “intended to draw attention to the billions of dollars the White House is pouring into green energy and clean cars,” according to NPR’s Camila Domonoske, who accompanied the secretary’s convoy. Granholm would make her case at townhall stops along the route.
In reality, the road trip proved that EVs are not yet ready for prime time — at least in the epic road trip department. Or, in Domonoske’s gentle words, “Granholm’s entourage at times had to grapple with the limitations of the present.”
Worse, the trip blew out the budget and broke regulations left and right, according to a scathing report released Wednesday by the Department of Energy’s inspector general (IG).
The main problem with taking an electric vehicle — or three electric vehicles, like Granholm — on a long road trip is that you can’t just pull up to any roadside service station and fill ‘er up. As the secretary’s team discovered upon their southeastern zig-zag, charging stations are sparse and can take up to an hour to charge a battery — if they’re even working at all.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Allstate and its subsidiary, Arity (“Allstate”), for unlawfully collecting, using, and selling data about the location and movement of Texans’ cell phones through secretly embedded software in mobile apps, such as Life360. Allstate and other insurers then used the covertly obtained data to justify raising Texans’ insurance rates.
Allstate, through its subsidiary data analytics company Arity, would pay app developers to incorporate its software to track consumers’ driving data. Allstate collected trillions of miles worth of location data from over 45 million consumers nationwide and used the data to create the “world’s largest driving behavior database.” When a consumer requested a quote or renewed their coverage, Allstate and other insurers would use that consumer’s data to justify increasing their car insurance premium.
These actions violated the Texas Data Privacy and Security Act (“TDPSA”), which created heightened protections for Texans’ sensitive data, including but not limited to precise geolocation information. The law requires clear notice and informed consent regarding how a company will use Texans’ sensitive data. Allstate never provided notice or obtained Texans’ consent to collect or sell their sensitive data. This is the first enforcement action ever filed by a State Attorney General to enforce a comprehensive data privacy law.
“Our investigation revealed that Allstate and Arity paid mobile apps millions of dollars to install Allstate’s tracking software,” said Attorney General Paxton. “The personal data of millions of Americans was sold to insurance companies without their knowledge or consent in violation of the law. Texans deserve better and we will hold all these companies accountable.”
This lawsuit follows Attorney General Paxton’s lawsuit against General Motors and his ongoing investigations into several car manufacturers for secretly collecting and selling drivers’ highly detailed driving data.
To read the filing, click here.
MANHATTAN, New York City (WABC) -- For many New Yorkers, Monday was the first day back to work following the holiday break, and for a swath of commuters, it was also the first time they paid the new congestion pricing toll to enter Manhattan below 60th Street.
On Monday, Gov. Kathy Hochul vowed to closely study congestion pricing data, and make changes to the program, if needed.
"I am committed and the MTA is committed to intensely monitoring the trends, and if adjustments are necessary, to be willing to make those going forward," she said.
"Traffic is down today," but Hochul noted it is also snowing. "Today is the first day. I wouldn't count today, let's give it a few days to sink in and get a trend."
Anthony Johnson has more on the impact of congestion pricing on New Jersey drivers entering Manhattan.
New York City's new congestion pricing toll began on Sunday, meaning many people will pay $9 to access the busiest part of the Big Apple during peak hours.
The toll is meant to reduce traffic gridlock in the densely packed city while raising money to help fix its ailing public transit infrastructure.
The invasion of the Bridge and Tunnel crowd won’t just be on weekends anymore.
Commuters to the Big Apple will be turning neighborhoods across the city into their own personal parking lots beginning this week, ditching their rides to save their wallets because of the $9 congestion pricing plan, concerned residents told The Post.
The plan is expected to upend neighborhoods closest to the 60th Street tolling zone with nightmarish gridlock as a surge of drivers begin scouring for free parking spots.